712 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 130 of
143
next >
last >>
Prosecutor v. Abdelkarim El. B.
Urteil (Judgment), 8 Nov 2016, Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
On 8 November 2016, German foreign fighter Abdelkarim El B. was convicted of membership in a terrorist organisation abroad, illegally possessing a Kalashnikov, and committing a war crime by treating a protected person in a gravely humiliating or degrading manner. He had travelled to Syria in September 2013 in order to fight for ISIL. On 7 November 2013, El. B. and his fellow ISIL fighters found the corpse of a Syrian army soldier. While the defendant was filming and verbally encouraging them, the other fighters cut the nose and ears of the dead body, stepped on it and then shot it in the face. On 10 February 2014, he was arrested at the German Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, and extradited to Germany on 25 February 2015. Abdelkarim El B. was sentenced to 8 years and 6 months of imprisonment.
Germany v. Mantelli: Federal Republic of Germany v. Mantelli et al.
Ordinanza, 29 May 2008, Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy
M. v. al-Tikriti: M. v. Barzan al-Tikriti
Décision, 22 Dec 2003, Federal Department of Defence, Switzerland
John Doe v. Exxon Mobil: John Doe et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al.
Memorandum, 12 Jan 2007, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, United States
Several villagers from Aceh, Indonesia, filed a civil suit against oil and gas company Exxon Mobil. They argued that the company carried responsibility for human rights violations committed by Indonesian security forces by hiring these forces and because Exxon Mobil knew or should have known that human rights violations were being committed.
After the District Court allowed the case to proceed in part, the plaintiffs presented an amended complaint, which was assessed again by the District Court. It allowed most of these claims, which were based on the laws of the District of Columbia, to proceed. Exxon appealed to this ruling, but the Court of Appeals stated that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The Court also refused to compel the District Court to dismiss the case.
Hrkač: Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Ivan Hrkač a/k/a Čikota
Indictment, 27 Dec 2007, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Preliminary Hearing Judge), Bosnia and Herzegovina
The accused Ivan Hrkač is suspected of committing war crimes against prisoners of war and war crimes against civilians during the armed conflict between the HVO and the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1993.
At the present moment, Ivan Hrkač is beyond the reach of the judicial authorities.
<< first
< prev
page 130 of
143
next >
last >>