696 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 132 of
140
next >
last >>
R. v. Hersi
Sentencing of accused for participating in terrorist group and counselling another person to participate in terrorist group, 24 Jul 2014, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Canada, Canada
Mr. Hersi was a naturalized Canadian citizen from Somalia living in Toronto. A drycleaner found a USB in Hersi’s security guard uniform containing suspicious documents, such as instructions on how to make explosives as well as various Islamic religious writings. The drycleaner notified the police, and the police investigated Mr. Hersi further using an undercover officer. During these meetings with the undercover officer, Mr. Hersi explained his well-developed plan to join the terrorist organisation Al-Shabaab and suggested that the UC also join.
The Court found Mr. Hersi guilty of (1) attempting to participate in the activities of Al-Shabaab and (2) counselling an undercover officer to participate in Al-Shabaab. The Court then sentenced Mr. Hersi to 10 years in prison, the maximum of 5 years for each of his offenses. Additionally, the Court held that Mr. Hersi be required to serve at least one-half his sentence, as opposed to the typical requirement of one-third of a sentence, before he could be released on parole, given the gravity of the offence and the unlikelihood of Hersi’s rehabilitation.
R. v. Sarwar (Yusuf): Yusuf Sarwar, Mohammed Ahmed v. Regina
Appeal Judgment, 9 Dec 2015, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), Great Britain (UK)
Sarwar and Ahmed travelled from the UK to Turkey and then Syria on 15 May 2013. Both had been in communications on social media with a number of figures discussing jihad and their plans to travel to Syria. They deceived their parents as to the purpose of their trip, which, in reality, was to become involved with anti-Assad forces. After their departure, Sarwar’s mother found a letter from him saying he planned to join Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria, and his parents then told the police.
Sarwar and Ahmed were arrested when they returned to the UK on 13 January 2014. A search of Sarwar’s luggage found over 1600 deleted pictures including those of Sarwar and Ahmed in combat zones and pictures of explosives being made. Both pled guilty to the offense of preparation of terrorist acts contrary to section 5(1) of the Terrorism Act 2006 and were sentenced to 17 years and 8 months in prison. Sarwar and Ahmed appealed the decision.
Sarwar and Ahmed claimed that once they arrived in Syria, they disassociated themselves from combat activities and offered humanitarian assistance. The Court found that while there was sustained preparation and travel, the trial court judge reached an incorrect conclusion on their involvement in combat activity. Therefore, sentences were reduced to 15 years and 3 months.
Cavallo: The Prosecutor v. Ricardo Miguel Cavallo
Fallo completo (Complete judgment), 26 Oct 2011, Tribunal Oral Federal Nº 5, Argentina
Karamira: Public Prosecutor v. Froduald Karamira
Jugement, 14 Feb 1997, Court of First Instance of Kigali / Tribunal de Première instance de Kigali, Rwanda
M.H.: Prosecutor v. M.H.
Verdict, 25 Jun 1997, District Court of Osijek, Croatia (Hrvatska)
The accused M.H. was a Croatian Serb who backed up the occupation of the village of Branjina (eastern Croatia) by the Yugoslav National Army (JNA) as part of paramilitary forces. As a member of the Territorial Defense (TO) in the village, he had absolute authority. The District Court of Osijek found him to be guilty of crimes against humanity and war crimes and sentenced him to five years of imprisonment in accordance with article 119 of the Basic Criminal Law of the Republic of Croatia.
<< first
< prev
page 132 of
140
next >
last >>