Search results

The appellant, Michel Gatera, was convicted by the Court of First Instance of Kibuye of genocide for his role in leading three sisters to a location where he knew they would subsequently be executed by a group of assailants. Two of the sisters died, the third survived as a result of circumstances outside the control of the perpetrators and testified against the appellant at trial. The Court of Appeal of Kigali, however, overturned the conviction and acquitted Gatera on the ground that there was no proof that established that Gatera had indeed led the three victims to their place of execution. The testimonial evidence relied upon by the Court of First Instance was found to be not reliable and contradictory. 

During the 1990s, several complaints of unlawful physical interrogation methods by the General Security Service reached the Israeli Supreme Court. In 1999, it assessed the essential question posed in most of these complaints: was the GSS even allowed to conduct interrogations and if so, did their interrogation methods fall within the scope of torture as prohibited by Israeli and international law. The Court answered the first question in the affirmative and deduced from a general provision in Israeli law the GSS’ authority to interrogate. However, the Court also stated that the GSS was not authorised to use most of the interrogation methods presented to the Court. These included long sleep deprivation, shaking suspects, covering suspects’ heads, and having them crouch on their toes for five minutes intervals. The GSS had argued that the ‘necessity’ defense provided sufficient authorisation to use these interrogations, as information obtained from interrogation might prevent terrorist attacks. The Court did not agree, stating that while the necessity defense might be used by an individual investigator during criminal proceedings, it cannot provide authorisation prior to using the prohibited interrogation methods.