skip navigation

Search results

Search terms: rigoberta menchu rios montt 'guatemala genocide case'

> Refine results with advanced case search

667 results (ordered by relevance)

<< first < prev   page 32 of 134   next > last >>

Solidarité avec les victimes de la guerre contre l'Irak v. Bush et al.: Association Solidarité avec les Victimes de la Guerre contre I'Irak v. George W. Bush et. al

Ordonnance de refus de donner suite, 8 May 2003, Ministère Public de la Confédération, Switzerland


Bush et al.: General Prosecutor v. Bush et al.

Décision en dessaisissement de la juridiction belge, 24 Sep 2003, The Court of Cassation, Belgium


Evans et al.: Regina v. Evans et al.

Decision following submissions of no case to answer, 3 Nov 2005, General Court Martial, Colchester, Great Britain (UK)

Seven U.K. soldiers were on patrol in Iraq on 11 May 2003, with the mission to look out for and halt persons attempting to smuggle money via neighbouring Iran. In the afternoon, a white Toyota pick-up truck came near to their checkpoint, but then drove away as if it was trying to avoid it. The patrollers decided to chase the car. They followed it until the village of Al-Ferkah, where they boxed the car with their vehicles. What happened then, is not entirely clear; what is known, though, is that force was used against both occupants; they were later taken to a hospital, but one of them, the 18 year old Nadhem Abdullah, was severely injured at his head and therefore sent to the Basra hospital for specialist treatment. Somewhere during the trip he died as consequence of his injuries. The U.K. military prosecutor accused the seven soldiers – a Corporal and six Privates under his command – of murder and violent disorder.

The judge found that there were serious issues with the evidence; most of the witness statements were either exaggerated or plain lies. Although it could be established that Abdullah had been assaulted by the accused’s section, it was unclear whether their use of force – which was in principle allowed, as part of their mission to bring an end to smuggling and other armed activities compromising security in the area – had been unlawful in the current case. Furthermore, no individual soldier could be identified as the person dealing the fatal blow, and no one could be individually found to have joined or encouraged an unlawful assault. Hence, all seven were acquitted of all charges.


Zemin et al.: The Prosecutor v. Jiang Zemin et al.

Order, 10 Jan 2006, National Court, 4th Section of the Criminal Division, Spain


Dai et al.: The Prosecutor v. Zhiznen Dai et al.

Sentencia, 20 Jun 2006, Supreme Court, Criminal Division, Spain


<< first < prev   page 32 of 134   next > last >>