556 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 40 of
112
next >
last >>
Ferrini v. Germany: Ferrini v. Federal Republic of Germany
Sentenza , 11 Mar 2004, Supreme Court, Italy
Germany v. Mantelli: Federal Republic of Germany v. Mantelli et al.
Ordinanza, 29 May 2008, Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy
Josef Milde: The Prosecutor v. Max Josef Milde
Sentenza, 21 Oct 2008, Supreme Court, Italy
Case of Ahorugeze v. Sweden
Judgment, 27 Oct 2011, European Court of Human Rights, France
Sylvère Ahorugeze was a Rwandan national and former director of the Rwandan Civil Aviation Authority and Kigali international airport. An international arrest warrant was issued against him on the basis of his alleged participation in the crime of genocide (intentional destruction of a national, racial, ethnical or religious group or part of it) and crimes against humanity (crimes committed on large scale including but not limited to murder, rape, torture) committed in Rwanda in 1994. On 16 July 2008, Ahorugeze was arrested in Sweden and on 7 July 2009, the Swedish government decided that he could be extradited to Rwanda.
Subsequently, Ahorugeze filed an application at the ECtHR. He claimed that his health was poor, and that his Hutu ethnic background, the prison conditions in Rwanda, and a lack of impartiality and independence of the judiciary were factors that should prevent his extradition to Rwanda. The Court dismissed his case and held that there were no reasons to believe that Ahorugeze would be subjected to inhumane or unfair treatment in Rwanda and that he would not receive a fair trial.
Doe I et al. v. UNOCAL et al.: John Doe I et al. v. UNOCAL Corp. et al.
Ruling on UNOCAL Defendants' Motion for Judgment, 14 Sep 2004, Superior Court of California, Country of Los Angeles, United States
In 1979, fourteen Burmese villagers filed a complaint against the oil company UNOCAL. They claimed that they suffered abuses including torture and rape during the construction of the Yadana Pipeline. UNOCAL allegedly assisted in the abuses perpetrated by the military government in Rangoon.
The Burmese villagers based their claim on the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which allows US courts to decide cases in respect of foreign nationals for crimes that occurred outside of the US.
In the particular decision, the Superior Court held that even though one of the theories of the Burmese villagers was refused, the case was not dismissed and as a result, they were allowed to proceed with their further theories. On 14 September 2004, the defendants’ motion for judgment was denied.
<< first
< prev
page 40 of
112
next >
last >>