725 results (ordered by date)
<< first
< prev
page 41 of
145
next >
last >>
M. v. al-Tikriti: M. v. Barzan al-Tikriti
Décision, 22 Dec 2003, Federal Department of Defence, Switzerland
A. A. Z et al. v. Franks et al.: A. A. Z. et al. v. Tommy Franks et al.
Décision, 14 Jan 2004, Cour de Cassation, Section Francaise, 2e Chambre / Court of Cassation, Belgium
Bukumba : Madeleine Mangabu Bukumba and Gracia Mukumba, Applicant and The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Respondent
Application for judicial review of decision that applicant was not Convention refugee, 22 Jan 2004, Federal Court, Canada
Madelaine Bukumba, a woman originally from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), was previously employed by the Comité de Securité de l'État (CSE). Her job was to listen incognito to the conversations of individuals in public places and to report on their opinions to the CSE as well as on media coverage of the government.
After being shown on television speaking against the government’s use of child soldiers, Bukumba was put in prison for 15 days. Following her release, she attempted to quit her job but was threatened to be killed if she would quit. Thereafter, Bukumba fled to Kenya and eventually to Canada together with her minor daughter.
Bukumba claimed protection under the UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees in order not to be returned to the DRC. The Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada held that she did not qualify for protection because she had been an accomplice to serious crimes committed by the government because she was a former governmental employee. In addition, the Immigration and Refugee Board held that there was no risk to her or her daughter’s life if returned to the DRC.
Kamuhanda: The Prosecutor v. Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda
Judgement, 22 Jan 2004, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (Trial Chamber II), Tanzania
On 22 January 2004, Trial Chamber II of the ICTR found Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda, former Rwandan Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research, guilty on two counts of genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity. The Tribunal sentenced him to prison for the remainder of his life.
The Trial Chamber found the Accused not guilty of five counts in the nine counts indictment against him. They included conspiracy to commit genocide, rape and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, and two counts of violations of the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II. The Chamber also dismissed two counts of complicity in genocide and murder as a crime against humanity.
In reaching its guilty verdict on two counts, the Trial Chamber found that Kamuhanda had the intent to destroy the Tutsi ethnic group in whole or in part and was individually criminally responsible for instigating, ordering, aiding and abetting genocide against Tutsi by virtue of his role in the killing of members of the Tutsi ethnic group in the Gikomero Parish Compound where he ordered Interahamwe militia, soldiers, and policemen to kill the Tutsis. The Trial Chamber also found that a large number of Tutsi were exterminated as a direct result of Kamuhanda’s participation by ordering, instigating, aiding and abetting the attack at the Gikomero Parish compound.
De Jesus: Deputy General Prosecutor for Serious Crimes v. Paulino de Jesus
Final Judgement, 26 Jan 2004, Special Panels for Serious Crimes (District Court of Dili), East Timor
Indonesia’s illegal occupation of East Timor from 1975 until 2002 was characterised by the perpetration of a number of attacks against the civilian population, particularly those suspected of being pro-independence supporters.
One such attack occurred on the village of Lourbs in September 1999 when members of the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) and various militias burnt down homes, and wounded and killed a number of persons. In the course of this attack, a young girl was abducted by TNI soldiers and stabbed through the back; her mother was shot through leg as she attempted to save her. The Prosecution alleged that the Accused, Paulino de Jesus, was responsible for the murder of the little girl and indirectly for the wounding of her mother although he is not alleged to have fired the shot.
The Special Panels for Serious Crimes acquitted De Jesus on the grounds that the witness evidence did not establish with sufficient certainty either that he was present in the village at the time of the attack, or that he was the author of the charged crimes.
<< first
< prev
page 41 of
145
next >
last >>