517 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 7 of
104
next >
last >>
Simbikangwa: The Public Prosecutor v. Pascal Simbikangwa
(Trial is ongoing), Cour d'Assises de Paris, France
Krofan & Andea: Krofan and Andea v. Public Prosecutor
Judgment, 5 Oct 1966, Federal Court of Singapore, Singapore
In May 1961, Malaya proposed the formation of the Federation of Malaya by amalgamating Malaya, Singapore and the British colonies in Borneo (Sabah, Sarawak and Brunei). Whilst Indonesia did not initially oppose the Federation, it did following the outbreak in 1962 of revolt in Brunei by a radical Muslim movement. From 1962 until 1966, a state of armed conflict existed between Indonesia and the Federation of Malaysia (of which Singapore was part since its merger in September 1963), otherwise known as the Indonesia-Malaysian Confrontation.
It was in the context of this armed conflict that on 14 April 1965, Stanislaus Krofan and Andres Andea set foot on Singapore/Malay soil carrying explosives with the intention of setting them off. Upon apprehension, they claimed that they were members of the Indonesian Armed Forces and had been ordered by their superiors to set off the explosives in Singapore. They were convicted by the High Court in Singapore for unlawful possession of explosives in a security area.
On appeal, the Federal Court of Singapore was asked to determine the applicability of the 1949 Geneva Conventions to Singapore at the time of the offence and determine whether Krofan and Andea were entitled to protections as prisoners of war under the Convention. By its judgment of 5 October 1966, the Court assumed that the 1949 Geneva Conventions were applicable and concluded that the appellants were not entitled to protection as prisoners of war. Although members of the Indonesian Armed Forces, they had been caught in civilian clothing acting as saboteurs.
Bizumutima: Public Prosecutor v. François Bizumutima
Judgment and sentence, 17 Jan 1997, Specialized Chamber, Tribunal of First Instance of Byumba, Rwanda
Karamira: Public Prosecutor v. Froduald Karamira
Jugement, 14 Feb 1997, Court of First Instance of Kigali / Tribunal de Première instance de Kigali, Rwanda
Dusingize: The Public Prosecutor v. Alexis Dusingize
Judgment, 12 Mar 1997, Court of First Instance of Nyamata (Specialised Chamber), Rwanda
During the 1994 Rwandan genocide in which persons of Tutsi ethnicity and moderate Hutus were systematically exterminated by apparatus of the Rwandan State and Hutu civilian militias including the Interahamwe, it is estimated that some 500,000 people were killed, thousands displaced to neighbouring countries and thousands more raped.
The present decision concerns the conviction for genocide and murder as a crime against humanity of Alexis Dusingize who directed a group of assassins during the conflict to murder the Tutsi that they came across. He operated from a roadblock, which he used to verify the identity cards of those that sought to pass with the aim of separating the Tutsi from the Hutu. He was convicted by the Court of First Instance at Nyamata and sentenced to death for his crimes.
<< first
< prev
page 7 of
104
next >
last >>