skip navigation

Search results

> Refine results with advanced case search

725 results (ordered by date)

<< first < prev   page 81 of 145   next > last >>

Monroe et al.: The Prosecutor v. Julio Rolando Salazar Monroe et al.

Sentencia, 8 Apr 2008, Superior Court of Justice of Lima, First Special Criminal Chamber, Peru


Pejić: Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor v. Milorad Pejić

Indictment, 8 Apr 2008, District Court in Belgrade, War Crimes Chamber, Serbia-Montenegro

Milorad Pejić was born on 4 April 1969 in the village of Vukovar located in eastern Croatia. Pejić, who lived in the United Kingdom since 1999, was arrested in March 2008 at the airport in Belgrade when he wanted to bring a visit to his mother. He was charged with being involved in a horrific massacre that took place in November 1991. At that time, ethnic Croat prisoners were taken from the Vukovar hospital and subsequently brought to a pig farm in Ovčara, outside Vukovar. The prisoners were beaten, tortured and subsequently killed. Their bodies were buried in mass graves.


Harbury v. Hayden et al.: Jennifer K. Harbury v. Michael V. Hayden et al. / Jennifer K. Harbury on her own behalf and as administratrix of the Estate of Efrain Bamaca—Velasquez, Appellant v. Michael V. Hayden, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), et al., Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 96cv00438), 15 Apr 2008, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States

In 2006, Jennifer Harbury, the wife of ex-rebel commander Efrain Bamaca-Velasquez who was killed in Guatemala in the early 1990s, brought a complaint against U.S. governmental officials. Harbury claimed that her husband was captured in 1992 by Guatemalan army officers who were affiliated with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Harbury claimed that Bamaca was physically abused and tortured during his detention in order to extract information from him about the Guatemalan rebel forces.

Harbury’s tort claim was dismissed because the District Court found that it did not have authority to rule on it since the damage occurred in another state, namely in Guatemala. On appeal, the decision was upheld by the Court of Appeals. The Court ruled that the case involved political questions which are non-justiciable, and, in addition, that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to consider Harbury’s tort claim.


Fuštar: Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Dušan Fuštar

Verdict, 21 Apr 2008, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Section I for War Crimes, Criminal Division, Bosnia and Herzegovina

In this case appearing before the Criminal Division, the accused Dušan Fuštar was found guilty for crimes against humanity regarding his participation in the running of the Keraterm camp in Prijedor municipality. He was sentenced to 9 years of imprisonment after he entered a plea agreement with the Prosecutor’s Office.

This marked the first time that a case referred to the Court of BiH by the ICTY (in the case of Željko Mejakić et al.) was settled through a plea agreement. The Court found Dušan Fuštar guilty and sentenced him to nine years of imprisonment.


Palija: Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Jadranko Palija

Second instance verdict, 24 Apr 2008, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Section I for War Crimes, Appellate Division, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jadranko Palija, a former member of the Serbian army, was accused of having committed war crimes against civilians and crimes against humanity during the armed conflict in the former Yugoslavia. The indictment against him accused him of participation in 19 murders and some counts of intimidation and rape committed against Bosniak and Croatian civilians. On 28 November 2007, Palija was found guilty on all charges by the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and sentenced to 28 years in prison. He appealed against his conviction, but this did not help him: on 24 April 2008, the Appellate Panel of the Court ruled that the Trial Panel had been correct in both its analysis of the facts and the application of the law. Therefore, the conviction and prison sentence were both confirmed.


<< first < prev   page 81 of 145   next > last >>