460 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 9 of
92
next >
last >>
Kouwenhoven: The Public Prosecutor v. Guus Kouwenhoven
Interlocutory Judgment, 19 Mar 2007, Court of Appeal of The Hague, The Netherlands
Guus Kouwenhoven was convicted in first instance for his involvement in supplying arms to Liberia and acquitted of having committed war crimes during the Second Liberian Civil War (1999-2003).
Both the prosecutor and Kouwenhoven appealed against this verdict. In an interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals most importantly rejected the motion of the defense to bar the prosecutor from prosecuting this case. Based on the information before it, the Court did not find grave violations of Kouwenhoven's right to a fair trial. The Court did sustain the defense’s motion to have more witnesses heard by the investigative judge. The Court foresaw this to be a lengthy process, and therefore suspended Kouwenhoven’s detention.
Fitzsimons: Danny Fitzsimons
, 28 Feb 2011, Karkh Criminal Court, Iraq
American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Justice: American Civil Liberties Union et al. v. Department of Justice et al.
Memorandum Opinion, 9 Sep 2011, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, United States
Unmanned aerial vehicles, more commonly known as drones, are remote-controlled, unmanned planes that can be operated from anywhere in the world by pilots located thousands of miles away from the drone. Specific individuals can be targeted and fired upon from thousands of miles away.
Amidst reports that the United States Armed Forces and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are using drone strikes to target suspected terrorists in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen, the non-profit organisation, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a request with the US Departments of State, Defense and Justice, as well as the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act seeking access to records about the US drone program as well as its legal basis under domestic and international law. Faced with a refusal from the CIA to even confirm or deny the existence of such records, the ACLU filed a lawsuit before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Court held, however, that the CIA’s refusal to confirm or deny the existence of such records falls within the exemptions to disclosure outlined by the Freedom of Information Act because such records pertain to national security and are protected from disclosure by the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 and the National Security Act of 1947.
The decision is presently on appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
United States of America v. Nader Elhuzayel and Muhanad Badawi
Jury Verdict, 21 Jun 2016, District Court for the Central District of California, United States
Two men, Mr. Nader Elhuzayel and Mr. Muhanad Badawi, were found guilty by a jury of conspiring to support the Islamic State on 21 June 2016 after earlier pleading not guilty. In particular, Mr. Elhuzayel, who was arrested prior to boarding a flight to Israel via Turkey at Los Angeles International Airport, was found to have encouraged others to support and join the Islamic State, and to have vowed to travel to Syria to fight for the terrorist group himself. Both were also convicted of financial fraud charges, the proceeds of which were used to fund the travel. A decision with regard to sentencing is anticipated later this year.
Basulto et al. v. Castro et al.: José J. Basulto et. al v. Fidel Castro Ruz et al.
Plainte avec constitution de partie civile / Complaint, 4 Oct 2001,
<< first
< prev
page 9 of
92
next >
last >>