16 results (ordered by relevance)
<< first
< prev
page 1 of
4
next >
last >>
Pekez et al.: Prosecutor's Office Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Mirko Pekez, Mirko Pekez and Milorad Savić
Verdict, 29 Sep 2008, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Section I for War Crimes, Appellate Division, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Mirko Pekez (son of Mile), Mirko Pekez (son of Špiro), and Milorad Savić were all born in Bosnia and Herzegovina. During the armed conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which began in April 1992 and ended in November 1995, the three of them were members of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (VRS).
On 10 September 1992, members of the VRS took Bosnian civilians out of their homes in Ljoljići-Čerkazovići located in the municipality of Jajce (central Bosnia and Herzegovina), and subsequently brought them to the nearby village of Draganovac where they were lined up against the edge of an abyss before being shot. Mirko Pekez (son of Mile), Mirko Pekez (son of Špiro), and Milorad Savić were charged for their participation in the killing of 23 and the wounding of four of the Bosnian civilians. On 29 September 2008, the Appellate Panel of Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found Pekez (son of Mile) guilty for the crimes, and ordered a retrial.
Radak: Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor v. Saša Radak
Indictment, 13 Apr 2005, District Court in Belgrade, War Crimes Chamber, Serbia-Montenegro
Saša Radak was a member of a volunteer unit of the Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA). The War Crimes Prosecutor alleged that, in the period between 20 and 21 November 1991, together with other volunteer and as a part of a shooting platoon, Radak has treated inhumanely and executed 192 of the Croatian POWs.
Even though verdicts against Radak were entered on two occasions (2006 and 2009) and he was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment, the Supreme Court of Serbia overturned them both, in 2007 and 2013, respectively. This was due to the significant breaches of the criminal procedure and the verdicts being based on insufficiently verified factual evidences.
Jelisić: The Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić
Judgment, 14 Dec 1999, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Trial Chamber I, The Netherlands
Jelisić was brought before the ICTY for his role in the commission of crimes in the municipality of Brčko (Bosnia and Herzegovina) in 1992. During this time, the Serb forces obtained control over the area and expelled the Croat and Muslim residents from their homes. The non-Serbs were detained in collection centres, such as the Luka camp near the town of Brčko (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Those detained were subjected to inhumane conditions, killings and mistreatments. Jelisić regularly entered the Luka camp and beat, mistreated and often killed the detainees.
Jelisić pleaded not guilty to genocide and guilty to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Trial Chamber I held that the requirements of his guilty plea have been fulfilled and, subsequently, it found Jelisić guilty of all counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes to which he pleaded guilty.
With respect to genocide, Trial Chamber I found that there was insufficient evidence to prove the existence of a special plan to destroy the Muslim group (the special intent element required for the crime of genocide) in Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Similarly, Trial Chamber I found that even Jelisić himself did not have this special intent. Therefore, he was acquitted of the charge of genocide.
Jelisić was sentenced to 40 years of imprisonment.
Jelisić: The Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić
Judgment, 5 Jul 2001, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Appeals Chamber, The Netherlands
Jelisić was brought before the ICTY for his role in the commission of crimes in the municipality of Brčko (Bosnia and Herzegovina) in 1992.
Jelisić pleaded not guilty to genocide and guilty to war crimes and crimes against humanity. With respect to genocide, Trial Chamber I found him not guilty due to insufficient evidence to sustain his responsibility. For the crimes to which he pleaded guilty, Trial Chamber I sentenced him to 40 years of imprisonment. Therefore, Trial Chamber I’s acquittal of genocide was appealed by the Prosecutor, and Jelisić was allowed to respond.
The Appeals Chamber allowed the Prosecution’s first two appeals, in which it upheld the argument that Trial Chamber I erred when entered an acquittal without first hearing the Prosecution, and when applied an erroneous legal standard which led it to incorrectly assess the evidence.
The Appeals Chamber was unable to conclude that Jelisić did not possess the special intent required for genocide (the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group). However, the Appeals Chamber declined to reverse the acquittal on genocide.
The Appeals Chamber found an error in Trial Chamber I’s finding that Jelisić was guilty of two murders, when in fact he pleaded guilty to only one.
Jelisić’s sentence was affirmed.
M.P. et al.: Public Prosecutor v. M.P. et al.
Verdict, 24 Apr 1997, District Court in Zadar, Croatia (Hrvatska)
The Zadar County Court of Croatia, in its verdict of 24 April 1997, convicted in absentia 19 officers of the so-called Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA) for the siege of the city of Zadar, which caused the death of at least 30 civilians and the destruction of significant parts of the city – including facilities and objects of large economic and cultural significance – without any military necessity to do so. The officers were found guilty of war crimes against civilians and crimes against humanity, and sentenced to prison sentences that ranged – depending on their military rank and degree of control over the campaign and, specifically, the targeting of unlawful targets – from ten to 20 years. However, as they had left Croatia before the initial indictment, the convicted persons have not yet been caught.
<< first
< prev
page 1 of
4
next >
last >>